Back to News
The development of the Henderson Defence Precinct in Western Australia marks a significant step in the development of Australia’s naval capabilities within the Indo-Pacific region.
In terms of scale and ambition, the project will be the Southern Hemisphere’s largest and most challenging advanced manufacturing defence project and will support the build of the new Landing Craft Heavy vessels for the Australian Army and new general-purpose frigates for the Navy.
Outside of ensuring Australia has the capability to build and maintain vessels, the Defence Precinct will encourage suppliers to pursue export markets – with one of the most significant opportunities being the potential for Australia to become a key player in advanced naval technology and shipbuilding.
The focus on nuclear submarine maintenance and the construction of larger, more complex vessels will also undoubtedly push Australia’s domestic defence industry to new heights and contribute to regional security.
Challenges need to be carefully considered. Similar to an iceberg, where potential dangers lie below the surface, the most significant risks may not always be immediately visible.
Successfully analysing and identifying challenges below the waterline—spanning safety, environmental, geopolitical, and economic aspects—requires careful planning, risk management, and continuous stakeholder engagement to keep the project on course both financially and on schedule.
While Quantitative Cost and Schedule Risk Analysis (QCSRA) cannot replace effective project management, it can play a fundamental role in identifying and managing issues and opportunities to enhance project outcomes and prevent major failures.
QCSRA Advantages Over Traditional Qualitative Risk Assessments:
Defence projects are inherently complex due to a variety of factors. These include conflicting and moving targets, heightened scrutiny from non-government organisations (NGOs), the media, and the involvement of multiple regulatory bodies.
The introduction of new or innovative technologies adds another layer of complexity, as does the management of intricate contractual arrangements.
Additionally, the large scale of these projects and their potential impact on sensitive community or environmental issues, particularly concerning issues such as nuclear waste, further contribute to their risk profile.
QCSRA assigns numerical probabilities and impacts to potential risk events, enabling more representative contingency planning and resource allocation. This precision is particularly valuable for defence initiatives, which are characterised by their large scale, extended timelines, advanced technologies, and significant financial investments.
This comprehensive approach ensures that the risk analysis covers the full spectrum of potential issues, including technical, financial, regulatory, and operational risks. By allowing decision-makers to understand how risks in one area might impact others, they are provided with a more accurate picture of the overall project risk landscape.
For example, delays or cost overruns in one project may have cascading effects on others due to shared resources or dependencies. By modelling these relationships quantitatively, defence planners can make more informed decisions about project prioritisation, resource allocation, and risk mitigation strategies.
The use of Monte Carlo simulation techniques is also particularly relevant for defence projects. This approach allows for thousands of potential scenarios to be modelled, providing a comprehensive understanding of the range of possible outcomes.
For projects with long durations and high technological uncertainty, like nuclear submarine development, this level of analysis is invaluable.
Furthermore, portfolio wide QCSRA can help Australia manage the challenges associated with developing domestic shipbuilding capabilities by quantifying risks related to workforce development, supply chain management, and technology transfer. In this way decision-makers can better plan for and mitigate potential obstacles.
Final Thoughts
Ultimately, implementing rigorous QCSRA practices can enhance the ability to deliver important defence capabilities on time and within budget and provides a framework for continuous risk monitoring and management, allowing for proactive adjustments as projects evolve and new risks emerge.
This approach aligns with best practices in project management and can help ensure the likelihood of successful outcomes for Australia’s ambitious naval modernisation efforts.
As Australia moves forward with initiatives that push the boundaries of our defence capabilities, embracing advanced risk analysis methods will be a defining factor of success in an increasingly complex and fast-moving global landscape.
Contact TBH Defence expert Judith Irvine and Moataz Mahmoud for more information on how QCSRA can help quantify the risks associated with integrating new technologies, managing complex supply chains, and coordinating international partnerships.